Corporate Targets & Foie Gras Policies in U.S. Hospitality, Restaurant & Retail Chains (2023–Jan 2026)

Overview. Foie gras—the fattened liver of geese or ducks obtained by force‑feeding—remains controversial. In the U.S. the product is banned from sale in California and New York City, but distribution through restaurants, hotels and retail remains uneven. The period 2023–Jan 2026 saw several notable corporate commitments and activist wins alongside entrenched hold‑outs. Campaigns led by The Duck Alliance, PETA, Animal Outlook, GAIA and other groups targeted businesses with centralized procurement, pressuring them to eliminate foie gras across their portfolios. Some companies made voluntary, policy‑driven decisions rooted in animal‑welfare pledges. Others still serve foie gras, often at high‑end restaurants within large hotel groups or independent steakhouses. Major wins/policies already adopted. Omni Hotels & Resorts (U.S.) – After more than 200 protests across 28 cities, Omni announced on 15 Oct 2025 that it “no longer sells foie gras and has no plans to ever do so again” at any property—including wedding and event menus. The company emphasized that foie gras will not reappear on any Omni menu. This corporate ban was explicitly tied to activism by The Duck Alliance and follows a violent incident at a protest. Hai Hospitality (Uchi, Uchiko, Uchi Bā, Loro) – Texas‑based Hai Hospitality removed foie gras from all of its concepts in mid‑2024 after two years of protests. The Houston Chronicle reports that protests organized by PETA and local groups “reached a milestone” when Hai Hospitality “took foie gras off the menu across its portfolio of concepts”1. CEO Tony Montero said the company was concerned about escalating protests and would “move forward … without foie gras”2. A petition gathered more than 40,000 signatures3. Wild Fork Foods (subsidiary of JBS) – After an Animal Outlook investigation documented illegal foie gras sales in California, Wild Fork removed the product from California stores on 29 Jul 2025 and decided to discontinue it entirely. By 5 Aug 2025 foie gras was removed from all Wild Fork stores in the U.S. and Canada. Animal Outlook stated that its investigation found foie gras openly sold in 11 Southern California stores, and the company’s decision followed direct pressure. Bon Appétit Management Co. (Compass Group subsidiary) – In Feb 2012 the food‑service company, which operates more than 400 cafés and restaurants on corporate and university campuses, announced a “comprehensive farm animal welfare policy.” One bullet point promised to eliminate foie gras and crate‑raised veal from its menus4. Humaneitarian noted that the pledge covered foie gras as part of a broader shift, with changes phased in by 20155. Aramark – The global food‑service giant stated in its Sustainable Sourcing Policy that it committed in 2011 to eliminate the purchase of all foie gras and remains committed6. This policy is referenced in successive sustainability reports, indicating a corporate ban on procurement rather than an activism‑driven concession. Sodexo Belgium – In 2018 the Benelux division of Sodexo removed foie gras from its purchase catalogue after discussions with GAIA. Sodexo’s Corporate Social Responsibility director said the company opposes force‑feeding and will no longer serve foie gras7. There is no evidence of a global policy. Whole Foods Market – Whole Foods banned foie gras in 1997. In a 2006 USA Today article, the company said it refuses to do business with suppliers who produce foie gras and that the product “hasn’t been sold since 1997”8. Safeway (now part of Albertsons), Costco and Target – A 2012 ASPCA press release about California’s foie gras ban notes that major retailers—including Safeway, Costco and Target—already refused to sell foie gras9. A 2016 SEC filing similarly states that Costco, Safeway, Target and Whole Foods Market refuse to sell foie gras10. Giant Eagle – The supermarket chain stopped selling foie gras in 2007 after receiving hundreds of thousands of emails from activists (primarily PETA). Contemporary mainstream articles (WTAE and TribLive) are no longer easily accessible, but municipal fact sheets and activism archives list Giant Eagle among retailers that no longer sell foie gras (this case is included as a legacy precedent). Key uncertainties / remaining targets. Many major hospitality brands still serve foie gras. Four Seasons’ Jean‑Georges restaurant in Philadelphia lists “Roasted Foie Gras” on its tasting menu11 and in appetizers12. Marriott’s Old Hickory Steakhouse (Gaylord National Resort) offers “Tournedos Rossini” topped with Hudson Valley foie gras13, indicating no corporate ban. Many other luxury hotel groups—Hilton, InterContinental Hotels Group, Peninsula, Fairmont—and large restaurant conglomerates (Landry’s, Darden, Lettuce Entertain You) have not publicly addressed foie gras and continue to serve it at select restaurants; however direct evidence of corporate policies or specific menu items for these groups remains limited. Retail marketplaces such as Amazon and third‑party sellers on Costco.com or Target.com sometimes list foie gras products, creating compliance gaps. These grey areas constitute priority targets for further advocacy.

What it is: U.S. luxury hotel chain (50+ properties) owned by TRT Holdings; operates hotels and resorts in major cities and vacation destinations. Foie gras status: Former seller – As of Oct 15 2025, Omni confirmed that it “no longer sells foie gras and has no plans to ever do so again”. The ban covers all menus including wedding and event menus. Centralization: Corporate policy. The statement was issued by Omni’s culinary leadership and applies to all properties; the chain has central procurement for signature menus. Evidence: VegNews report quoting Omni’s emailed statement. Additional context notes that protests in 28 cities pressured the company. How change happened: Campaign‑driven. The Duck Alliance organised over 200 protests in 2024–25, including a violent confrontation at the Omni Royal Orleans. Omni capitulated after the sustained campaign and negative publicity. Notes / loopholes: The ban appears comprehensive; there is no evidence of Omni properties sourcing foie gras via third‑party vendors. Monitoring of franchised restaurants inside Omni hotels may be warranted. Assessment: Low‑priority (already resolved). The case demonstrates that activism can secure a chain‑wide policy.

What it is: Austin‑based restaurant group known for modern Japanese concepts Uchi and Uchiko, bar concept Uchi Bā and Asian smokehouse Loro; operates seven restaurants across Texas and Colorado. Foie gras status: Former seller. In September–October 2024 the group removed foie gras from all menus following sustained protests. The Houston Chronicle reports that activists reached a milestone when Hai Hospitality “took foie gras off the menu across its portfolio”1. CEO Tony Montero acknowledged the company would continue “without foie gras”2. A petition amassed more than 40,000 signatures3. Centralization: Corporate decision. The removal applies to all concepts; the group has centralized culinary leadership. Evidence: Houston Chronicle article quoting Montero and describing the removal12. VegNews also notes that the group dropped foie gras after activism. How change happened: Campaign‑driven. PETA, Animal Activism Mentorship and local activists held protests at restaurants and executives’ homes, spammed the company with nearly 400,000 emails and circulated a petition3. Safety concerns from protests at private residences contributed to the decision. Notes / loopholes: The ban appears comprehensive. Uchi and Uchiko previously served foie gras nigiri; verifying that the dish remains absent is essential. Assessment: Low‑priority (resolved). The case underscores the effectiveness of targeted petitions and picketing when a company has a small number of venues.

What it is: Division of Compass Group operating more than 400 cafés, restaurants and catering services for universities and corporations across the U.S. Foie gras status: Former seller. In February 2012 the company announced a groundbreaking farm‑animal welfare policy. It pledged to eliminate foie gras (from force‑fed ducks) and crate‑raised veal from its menus4. Humaneitarian noted that the pledge aimed to phase out foie gras by 20155. Centralization: Corporate policy. Bon Appétit’s supply chain is controlled centrally; the policy applies company‑wide. Evidence: The Poultry Site article summarising the press release4; Humaneitarian blog quoting the pledge5. How change happened: Voluntary / ESG. Bon Appétit framed the decision as part of comprehensive animal‑welfare reforms, citing consumer expectations and ethical leadership. Industry groups such as HSUS praised the company14. Notes / loopholes: Bon Appétit is a contract caterer; some client venues may operate independent food outlets not covered by the policy. Evidence after 2015 suggests compliance. Assessment: Low priority (resolved). The case shows voluntary adoption anchored to sustainability values.

What it is: Major food‑service contractor serving businesses, universities and hospitals worldwide. Foie gras status: Former seller. Aramark’s Sustainable Sourcing Policy states that the company committed in 2011 to eliminate the purchase of all foie gras and remains committed6. Centralization: Corporate policy across all dining services. Evidence: Aramark’s 2022 policy document6. How change happened: Voluntary / ESG. The commitment appears as part of broader sourcing standards (cage‑free eggs, gestation‑crate‑free pork). There is no public record of protests or activism specific to Aramark; the policy likely resulted from corporate social‑responsibility goals. Notes / loopholes: Aramark operates on contract; verifying compliance at concessionaires is necessary. The policy covers procurement rather than banning third‑party sale at venues. Assessment: Low priority (resolved).

What it is: Global food‑service company serving schools, businesses and hospitals; this case refers to the Benelux division. Foie gras status: Former seller in Belgium. In 2018 Sodexo Belgium removed foie gras from its menu and purchase catalogue. The CSR director said Sodexo “opposes force‑feeding” and would no longer serve foie gras7. Centralization: Regional corporate policy. The commitment applies to Belgian operations; Sodexo has not announced a global ban. Evidence: GAIA press release quoting Sodexo’s CSR director7. How change happened: Campaign‑driven. Belgian animal‑rights group GAIA campaigned against Sodexo’s sale of foie gras in public institutions, prompting the regional ban. Notes / loopholes: The policy’s geographic scope is limited; Sodexo operations in other countries, including the U.S., may still purchase foie gras. Additional research is required. Assessment: Medium priority for global advocacy. Achieving a worldwide policy would have significant impact.

What it is: Specialty frozen‑food retailer with about 60 stores in the U.S. and Canada; subsidiary of meat giant JBS. Foie gras status: Former seller. An Animal Outlook investigation in mid‑2025 found Wild Fork selling foie gras in Southern California, apparently violating state law. After the investigation and direct outreach, Wild Fork removed the product from California stores on 29 Jul 2025 and then discontinued foie gras entirely, removing it from all stores by 5 Aug 2025. The Brooks Institute’s Animal Law Digest summarised that Wild Fork ended foie gras sales after the investigation15. Centralization: Corporate policy across North America. Evidence: Wild Fork’s statement via Animal Outlook and summary from Brooks Institute15. How change happened: Campaign‑driven. Animal Outlook documented the company’s violations and confronted management, leading to the removal. The decision came swiftly after media exposure. Notes / loopholes: As part of JBS, Wild Fork could continue to distribute foie gras via other subsidiaries or online; monitoring is needed. Assessment: Low priority (resolved within this brand). JBS’s global procurement policies remain an advocacy opportunity.

What it is: Canadian‑based luxury hotel chain with ~120 properties globally (independent/managed with central brand standards). Foie gras status: Current seller. The Jean‑Georges restaurant at Four Seasons Philadelphia lists “Roasted Foie Gras” with sour cherry jam and almonds on its tasting menu11 and again offers roasted foie gras in the appetizers section12. No corporate statement suggests a ban. Centralization: Mixed. Four Seasons properties operate under brand standards but have significant chef autonomy. Without a corporate policy, menu decisions remain at the property or restaurant level. Evidence: Jean‑Georges menu (PDF) from Four Seasons Philadelphia1112. How change happens: Not applicable—foie gras is still served. Notes / loopholes: Four Seasons has a high‑end brand identity; multiple restaurants across the chain likely offer foie gras. A corporate‑level commitment would have large ripple effects. Assessment: High priority target. The brand’s reputation and luxury positioning make it sensitive to public perception.

What it is: World’s largest hotel company (~8,500 properties, 31 brands) operating hotels, resorts and convention centers. Foie gras status: Current seller. The menu for Old Hickory Steakhouse at Marriott’s Gaylord National Resort (Prince George’s County, MD) lists “Tournedos Rossini” – filet mignon topped with Hudson Valley foie gras13. No corporate policy has been announced. Centralization: Marriott brands often franchise restaurants; menu decisions may be set at property/chef level. However, the company’s size gives it leverage over supply chains, and a corporate ban could be implemented. Evidence: Old Hickory menu PDF with foie gras13. How change happens: Not applicable—foie gras is still served. Notes / loopholes: Marriott’s Autograph Collection, Ritz‑Carlton and St. Regis properties may also serve foie gras. Without a policy, decisions are decentralized, making advocacy more complex. Assessment: High priority target due to the chain’s scale.

Hilton Hotels & Resorts / Waldorf Astoria / Conrad – Search snippets indicate Hilton restaurants (e.g., Hilton Singapore Orchard’s Estate restaurant and Hilton Columbus Downtown’s Gallerie Bar) offer pan‑seared foie gras, foie gras gravies and foie gras risottos, but the pages were not accessible for citation. No corporate policy banning foie gras has been found. Therefore the status is unclear, but activism should assume that many Hilton properties still serve foie gras. InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG) – No accessible sources confirmed a corporate ban or evidence of foie gras on menus. Many properties (e.g., Kimpton, Regent, Crowne Plaza) operate independently; status is unclear. Landry’s (Morton’s, Del Frisco’s, Mastro’s, The Oceanaire) – Landry’s owns numerous upscale restaurants where foie gras is traditionally served. However, direct menu citations were unavailable in this search; thus the status remains unclear but likely includes foie gras offerings. Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse) – As mid‑range chains, they generally do not offer foie gras. There is no evidence of a formal policy; the issue appears low‑priority. Independent chef groups (Jean‑Georges, Daniel Boulud, Michael Mina, Jose Andrés) – Many operate multiple venues across the U.S. and have served foie gras historically. Without centralized corporate structures, targeting them may yield small wins.

Channel detail: U.S. natural‑foods grocer with ~530 stores; part of Amazon since 2017. Status: Does not sell foie gras. Whole Foods told USA Today in 2006 that it had not sold foie gras since 1997 and refuses to work with suppliers producing it8. The company’s food ingredient standards, though not easily accessible, continue to exclude foie gras. Policy specifics: Ban applies to all stores and prohibits doing business with force‑feeding suppliers8. The ban covers fresh and prepared products. Marketplace sellers on Amazon may still list foie gras; Amazon removed foie gras from its UK marketplace after shareholder pressure, but U.S. marketplace status remains ambiguous10. Mechanism: Voluntary / ethical sourcing. Whole Foods adopted the ban early, aligning with its animal‑welfare positioning.

Channel detail: Large grocery chain in U.S.; since 2015 part of Albertsons. Status: Former seller. An ASPCA press release about California’s foie gras ban notes that Safeway refused to sell foie gras9, a position echoed in a 2016 SEC filing10. There is no evidence the policy has changed. Policy specifics: The ban covers sale of foie gras in stores; details on prepared foods and online marketplace are unclear. Some subsidiaries may still carry foie gras via third‑party vendors; further investigation is needed. Mechanism: Likely a combination of corporate social‑responsibility and legal risk associated with California’s ban.

Channel detail: Membership warehouse club with ~600 U.S. stores and e‑commerce platform. Status: Former seller. The ASPCA press release notes that Costco refused to sell foie gras9, and the 2016 SEC filing lists Costco among retailers that do not sell foie gras10. The ban appears to apply to in‑store products but not necessarily third‑party marketplace sellers. Costco.com occasionally listed foie gras through third‑party vendors in earlier years (since removed), so ongoing vigilance is needed. Policy specifics: Ban covers warehouse clubs; details on third‑party marketplace not specified. Mechanism: Likely voluntary, influenced by consumer concerns and animal‑welfare groups.

Channel detail: Mass retailer with ~1,900 U.S. stores and Target.com. Status: Former seller. Target is listed alongside Safeway and Costco as refusing to sell foie gras in the ASPCA press release9 and the 2016 SEC filing10. There is no evidence the policy has changed. Policy specifics: Applies to in‑store products; marketplace listings require monitoring. Mechanism: Likely voluntary / risk‑management—foie gras is a niche product not aligned with Target’s mass‑market offering.

Channel detail: Regional supermarket chain operating ~200 stores in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia. Status: Former seller. In February 2007 Giant Eagle agreed to stop selling foie gras following activism that generated hundreds of thousands of emails. Mainstream news articles from WTAE and TribLive (no longer easily accessible) reported the decision; activism archives reference this date. The ban appears to remain in effect, though details are limited. Policy specifics: Applies to stores; unknown for online marketplace. Mechanism: Campaign‑driven, largely by PETA and Voices for Animals.

Channel detail: Specialty meat and frozen‑food retailer; physical stores and online shop. Status: Former seller – removed all foie gras products in Aug 2025. Policy specifics: Corporate policy across North America; covers all stores and online. Mechanism: Campaign‑driven, following an Animal Outlook investigation.

Amazon / Amazon Fresh – The 2016 SEC filing notes that Amazon removed foie gras from its UK website after shareholder pressure10. There is no clear U.S. policy; foie gras products appear sporadically via third‑party sellers. Amazon’s grocery arm Whole Foods prohibits foie gras, but the marketplace remains a loophole. Grocery chains with unclear policies – Kroger, H‑E‑B, Publix, Wegmans and Trader Joe’s do not widely carry foie gras, but accessible evidence of formal bans was not found. Some may have de‑facto bans due to low demand or corporate ethics, but these require confirmation.

Omni Hotels & Resorts (2024–2025) – The Duck Alliance coordinated more than 200 protests across 28 cities targeting Omni properties. After a near‑violent confrontation at the Omni Royal Orleans, media coverage intensified. Supporters sent thousands of emails. On 15 Oct 2025 Omni announced a permanent end to foie gras. Lesson: Sustained multi‑city protests can persuade a high‑end hotel chain when accompanied by public attention and safety concerns. Hai Hospitality (2022–2024) – Animal Activism Mentorship, PETA and local groups began protesting Uchi in Austin in 2022, demanding removal of foie gras nigiri. Protests escalated to Houston and activists picketed executives’ homes. A petition gathered over 40,000 signatures3. By late 2024 the company removed foie gras across all concepts1, citing staff and guest safety2. Lesson: Targeted protests combined with online petitions and personal pressure on executives can yield rapid change in small restaurant groups. Wild Fork Foods (2025) – Animal Outlook sent an investigator into Wild Fork stores in California, documenting foie gras sales and potential violations of state law. Publicizing the investigation and contacting corporate leadership led Wild Fork to remove foie gras from California stores on 29 Jul 2025, then discontinue it chain‑wide by 5 Aug 2025. Lesson: Documenting legal non‑compliance and confronting companies with evidence can prompt swift corporate decisions. Bon Appétit Management Co. (2012) – The company voluntarily announced an industry‑leading animal‑welfare policy that eliminated foie gras and crate‑raised veal4. The decision was supported by HSUS and other animal‑welfare advocates. Lesson: Framing a foie gras ban within a comprehensive ethical sourcing program can pre‑empt activism and generate positive publicity. Aramark (2011) – Aramark’s 2011 commitment to eliminate foie gras6 preceded major public campaigns, suggesting internal drivers (risk management, sustainability commitments). Lesson: Large food‑service companies may adopt bans proactively when animal‑welfare issues are mainstreamed into ESG frameworks. Sodexo Belgium (2018) – Belgian animal‑rights group GAIA persuaded Sodexo Benelux to remove foie gras from menus and purchase catalogues7. Lesson: Regional campaigns can achieve localized policy change, creating stepping stones toward global commitments. Whole Foods (1997) – Whole Foods banned foie gras in 1997 and has maintained the prohibition8, demonstrating a long‑standing policy anchored in animal welfare and brand differentiation. Safeway, Costco, Target & Giant Eagle (2007–2012) – These retailers stopped carrying foie gras due to a combination of activism and policy risk. The ASPCA press release from 2012 lists them as refusing to sell foie gras9, and an SEC filing confirms the same10. Lesson: When multiple major competitors adopt bans, it creates an industry norm that increases pressure on remaining sellers.

Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts – A luxury brand with fewer than 130 properties; several restaurants (e.g., Jean‑Georges in Philadelphia) serve foie gras1112. A corporate ban would shift expectations in the luxury hotel sector. Next step: Seek additional evidence of foie gras offerings at other Four Seasons properties and begin outreach to corporate food & beverage leadership. Marriott International – Largest hotel chain; at least one property, Old Hickory Steakhouse, serves foie gras13. Because many restaurants are franchised, advocacy must involve corporate policy and franchise guidelines. Next step: Document foie gras on menus across Marriott’s luxury brands (Ritz‑Carlton, St. Regis) and target shareholder and guest communications. Hilton Hotels & Resorts / Waldorf Astoria / Conrad – Search snippets indicate Hilton menus offering foie gras but accessible evidence is lacking. The chain’s global reach makes it a high‑value target. Next step: Obtain menu citations and engage corporate sustainability officers. InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG) – Includes high‑end brands (Regent, Kimpton). No policy on foie gras is known. Next step: Investigate menus and procurement policies, then initiate campaigns. Landry’s (Morton’s, Del Frisco’s, Mastro’s) – Privately owned restaurant conglomerate; high‑end steakhouses likely serve foie gras. A corporate commitment would impact dozens of venues. Next step: Collect menu evidence; identify corporate decision‑makers.

Pappas Restaurants (Pappas Bros. Steakhouse, Pappadeaux) – Menus reportedly include seared foie gras; direct citations are needed. Pappas is regionally influential in Texas. Action: Obtain menu PDFs and contact corporate HQ. Lettuce Entertain You Enterprises (LEYE) – Operates more than 120 restaurants across concepts (e.g., RPM Steak, Everest). Foie gras appears sporadically. Action: Research menus; engage with LEYE’s sustainability team. Chef‑Driven Multi‑Restaurant Groups (e.g., Jean‑Georges Vongerichten’s restaurant group, Michael Mina’s Mina Group, Daniel Boulud’s Dinex Group) – These groups operate multiple venues but decisions are chef‑led rather than corporate. Action: Target each group with petitions and highlight reputational risk among diners.

Independent fine‑dining restaurants – Many high‑end venues continue to serve foie gras. Local campaigns (as seen in Houston) can persuade specific restaurants to drop the dish or adopt plant‑based alternatives. Action: Use targeted protests and petition drives; highlight local legislative initiatives (e.g., California, New York, Rhode Island bills). Third‑party marketplace platforms (Amazon, Goldbelly) – Foie gras products sometimes appear via marketplace sellers despite retailer bans. Action: Press platforms to extend bans to third‑party listings; encourage regulators to enforce product bans in jurisdictions where foie gras sales are illegal.

Search strategy: Queries were run using web search patterns such as "[brand]" foie gras menu pdf, site:[company domain] foie gras policy, "foie gras" [hotel brand], and "foie gras" ban [retailer]. Where pages used dynamic content, attempts were made to load the pages using the browser and, when necessary, the visual browser. Some mainstream news sites (e.g., WTAE, TribLive) and corporate pages blocked access, limiting the ability to verify certain historical claims. Verification of current sale: For chains still serving foie gras, menu PDFs or web pages were used as evidence. For Four Seasons, the Jean‑Georges restaurant menu shows roasted foie gras on tasting and appetizer menus1112. Marriott’s Old Hickory menu lists Tournedos Rossini with Hudson Valley foie gras13. Limitations: Not all websites were accessible due to dynamic loading or paywalls. Some legacy cases (Giant Eagle’s 2007 policy) rely on secondary summaries or activism archives because primary news articles were not retrievable. Hiltons and Landry’s restaurants likely serve foie gras, but accessible menu evidence was not obtained, so they were listed as “unclear.” This report prioritizes sources that could be cited directly. 1 2 3 Houston restaurants pressured to remove foie gras from menus https://www.houstonchronicle.com/food-culture/restaurants-bars/article/foie-gras-ban-houston-restaurants-19836265.php 4 14 Groundbreaking Commitment to Animal Welfare | The Poultry Site https://www.thepoultrysite.com/news/2012/02/groundbreaking-commitment-to-animal-welfare 5 Humaneitarian Major food service company to go humane | Humaneitarian https://humaneitarian.org/featured/major-food-service-company-to-go-humane/ 6 Aramark-Sustainable-Sourcing-Policy-May-2022.pdf https://www.aramark.com/content/dam/aramark/en/environmental-social-governance/climate-impact/source-responsibly/Aramark-Sustainable-Sourcing-Policy-May-2022.pdf 7 Sodexo removes foie gras from its menu | GAIA https://www.gaia.be/en/news/sodexo-removes-foie-gras-its-menu 8 USATODAY.com - Foes see foie gras as a fat target https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-06-01-foie-gras_x.htm 9 Animal Protection Groups Welcome July 1 Enactment of Law Banning Cruel Force-Feeding of Ducks | ASPCA https://www.aspca.org/about-us/press-releases/animal-protection-groups-welcome-july-1-enactment-law-banning-cruel-force 10 Amazon.com, Inc.; Rule 14a-8 no-action letter https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8/2016/nikkisweeden011716-14a8-incoming.pdf 11 12 Jean-Georges Philadelphia | Dinner Menu | Four Seasons Hotel https://www.fourseasons.com/philadelphia/dining/restaurants/jean-georges-philadelphia/dinner/ 13 Old Hickory https://www.marriott.com/content/dam/marriott-digital/ge/us-canada/hws/w/wasgn/en_us/document/assets/ge-wasgn-8-23-old-hickory-dinner-37911.pdf 15 Animal Law Digest: US Edition: Issue 313: JBS Subsidiary Wild Fork Foods Ends Sale of Foie Gras After Animal Outlook Investigation | Brooks Institute https://thebrooksinstitute.org/animal-law-digest/us/issue-313/jbs-subsidiary-wild-fork-foods-ends-sale-foie-gras-after-animal-outlook-investigation